Skip to page content

AEGLIX MIND

Intelligence for Africa and the Gulf

Reviewed campaign intelligence

APT41 DUST

Historical · OTHER · Global

Last reviewed:

Campaign overview

MITRE ATT&CK historical record. Dates reflect source observations. Current activity and target-region classification are not asserted; Global denotes unclassified catalogue coverage. APT41 DUST was conducted by APT41 from 2023 to July 2024 against entities in Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. APT41 DUST targeted sectors such as shipping, logistics, and media for information gathering purposes. APT41 used previously-observed malware such as DUSTPAN as well as newly observed tools such as DUSTTRAP in APT41 DUST.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

This is a historical record and does not establish current campaign activity.

Threat actor
APT41
Attribution confidence
Not established
First documented activity
2023-01-31
End date
Not established
Estimated victims
Not established
Reported impact
Not established

Unknown attribution, confidence and impact remain unspecified. Regional labels can include unspecified targets; assess the source evidence before acting.

Documented timeline

  1. Source-reported first observation; not a claim of current activity or confirmed campaign start/end.

    Source: MITRE ATT&CK

  2. Source-reported last observation; not a claim of current activity or confirmed campaign start/end.

    Source: MITRE ATT&CK

MITRE ATT&CK techniques

  • T1102 · Web Service

    Command And Control — APT41 DUST used compromised Google Workspace accounts for command and control.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1213.006 · Databases

    Collection — APT41 DUST collected data from victim Oracle databases using SQLULDR2.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1543.003 · Windows Service

    Persistence, Privilege Escalation — APT41 DUST used Windows Services with names such as `Windows Defend` for persistence of DUSTPAN.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1070.004 · File Deletion

    Stealth — APT41 DUST deleted various artifacts from victim systems following use.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1105 · Ingress Tool Transfer

    Command And Control — APT41 DUST involved execution of `certutil.exe` via web shell to download the DUSTPAN dropper.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1505.003 · Web Shell

    Persistence — APT41 DUST involved use of web shells such as ANTSWORD and BLUEBEAM for persistence.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1593.002 · Search Engines

    Reconnaissance — APT41 DUST involved use of search engines to research victim servers.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1588.003 · Code Signing Certificates

    Resource Development — APT41 DUST used stolen code signing certificates to sign DUSTTRAP malware and components.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1586.003 · Cloud Accounts

    Resource Development — APT41 DUST used compromised Google Workspace accounts for command and control.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1119 · Automated Collection

    Collection — APT41 DUST used tools such as SQLULDR2 and PINEGROVE to gather local system and database information.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1027.013 · Encrypted/Encoded File

    Stealth — APT41 DUST used encrypted payloads decrypted and executed in memory.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1074.001 · Local Data Staging

    Collection — APT41 DUST involved exporting data from Oracle databases to local CSV files prior to exfiltration.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1567.002 · Exfiltration to Cloud Storage

    Exfiltration — APT41 DUST exfiltrated collected information to OneDrive.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1036.004 · Masquerade Task or Service

    Stealth — APT41 DUST disguised DUSTPAN as a legitimate Windows binary such as `w3wp.exe` or `conn.exe`.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1596.005 · Scan Databases

    Reconnaissance — APT41 DUST used internet scan data for target development.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1574.001 · DLL

    Stealth, Execution — APT41 DUST involved the use of DLL search order hijacking to execute DUSTTRAP.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024) APT41 DUST used also DLL side-loading to execute DUSTTRAP via an AhnLab uninstaller.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1569.002 · Service Execution

    Execution — APT41 DUST used Windows services to execute DUSTPAN.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1560.001 · Archive via Utility

    Collection — APT41 DUST used `rar` to compress data downloaded from internal Oracle databases prior to exfiltration.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1071.001 · Web Protocols

    Command And Control — APT41 DUST used HTTPS for command and control.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1594 · Search Victim-Owned Websites

    Reconnaissance — APT41 DUST involved access of external victim websites for target development.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1583.007 · Serverless

    Resource Development — APT41 DUST used infrastructure hosted behind Cloudflare or utilized Cloudflare Workers for command and control.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1573.002 · Asymmetric Cryptography

    Command And Control — APT41 DUST used HTTPS for command and control.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

  • T1553.002 · Code Signing

    Defense Impairment — APT41 DUST used stolen code signing certificates for DUSTTRAP malware and subsequent payloads.(Citation: Google Cloud APT41 2024)

Linked indicators

0 reviewed indicators. An indicator’s presence does not establish that every resource on shared infrastructure is malicious.

No reviewed indicators are supplied. None are inferred from the campaign description.

Documented infrastructure

No reviewed infrastructure is supplied.

Sources and evidence

  • MITRE ATT&CK C0040

    Official MITRE ATT&CK campaign record C0040. Derived from mitre/cti commit 50be388e93819a5d20e71cbaaeccfda157abc846. Actor links and technique mappings are attributed to this source; confidence, victims, monetary impact and infrastructure are not inferred.

External sources retain their own licences and sharing conditions. Request a correction with supporting evidence.